May 28, 2011

Anagrams

Some random/funny anagrams you may have never figured out: 

Word
When you rearrange the letters
Dormitory
Dirty Room
The Morse Code
Here come dots
Slot Machines
Cash Lost in 'em
Desperation
A rope ends it
Animosity
Is No Amity
Mother-in-law
Woman Hitler
Snooze Alarms
Alas! No More Z's
Alec Guinness
Genuine Class
Semolina
Is No Meal
The Public Art Galleries 
Large Picture Halls, I Bet
A Decimal Point
I'm a Dot in Place
The Earthquakes
That Queer Shake
Eleven plus two
Twelve plus one
Contradiction
Accord not in it
Astronomer
Moon Starer
Princess Diana
End Is A Car Spin
An Intriguing One
Year Two Thousand
A Year To Shut Down
And one last for the USA to be proud of... :-(
President Clinton of the USA  
To copulate he finds interns

 Today's Random Picture:  

May 27, 2011

Fifteen Things That Make Me Feel Old

Kids these days can't relate to the world I grew up in, the 1990s. True, I'm still only 23, but today's teenagers will never know the things I am familiar with and the things that were commonplace when I was a child. These are fifteen things that make me feel old: 

1. Floppy disks: When I was in high school (1999-2003) I used a floppy disk to save my files... no fancy USB sticks were readily available to me back then...


2. I was 14 years old when my friends told me about the singer Aaliyah's death. I never listened to her music, but some of my friends were pretty serious fans... that was already almost 10 years ago.


3.  "The Backstreet Boys" were a popular boy band during the late 1990s to early 2000s. Below are their current ages.


4. If characters on the Simpsons actually got older, Bart Simpson would be 32 years old now.


5. The first "Harry Potter" movie came out 10 years ago... and Daniel Radcliffe was a little boy then... now he just looks old.

6. When Elijah Wood was first cast in the Lord of the Rings film triology, he was 18. He's 30 now.


7.  I read R.S. Stine's Goosebumps series when I was in elementary school (1992-1997). There hasn't been a new copy published in the series in 14 years.


8. "The" popular dance when I was a child was the macarena. That trend came out 16 years ago, when I was 7.



9. During my childhood Christmases, I watched Home Alone movies starring Macaulay Culkin, who is now 30 years old.

10. As a child, I remember watching a popular Pepsi commercial starring a little girl. The little girl is now 19 years old.


11. Many kids these days do not know the concept of rewinding a video tape... they have only ever used DVDs or downloaded movies off the internet.


12. Another popular band when I was an elementary school student in the 1990s were the Spice Girls. They are all in their mid to late thirties now.

13. The first state quarter in the series came out more than 12 years ago. I have the full collection of all 50 state quarters as well as the U.S. territories.

14. Taco Bell's chihuahua commercials first aired 14 years ago and the chihuahua died 2 years ago.


15. "You are the weakest link, good bye" hasn't been heard on American television in 9 years. I remember watching this show in high school thinking how stupidly selfish the contestant were... always voting off the smartest players.

Today's Random Quote:
"As I grow to understand life less and less, I learn to love it more and more." - Jules Renard

May 20, 2011

Linguistic Evolution - Species Evolution

How languages evolve and change is fascinating to think about. Lately, research shows that language evolution may actually be similar to species evolution. Sound too far-fetched? Two main opposing arguments state the following:

Group 1: Evolutionary change is gradual
Group 2: There are sudden jumps in evolution, separated by long periods of stasis.

As with all things scientific, both have their own merits and reality may involve a combination of the two theories. Mark Pagel at Reading University in England suggested a few years back that approximately 1/5 of evolution change occurs in sporadic patterns when new species form. This, Dr. Pagel and colleagues assert, holds true for languages as well. In a published  edition of Science, it states that languages evolve in a way that is interestingly similar to the way species evolve.

Historical proof can support this claim with the language used in this post: English. English went to dramatic changes within a span of a few hundred years. For instance, if anyone has ever read works from the Middle English era (Geoffrey Chaucer's The Canterbury Tales being the most classic example), the average English speaker finds the text incomprehensible, finds it as practically foreign in fact. This is 14th century. Of course, certain language aficionados and English majors may still understand it without the help of an interpreter, but pick a random bloke off the street and ask him to read Chaucer in its original form and I assure you, he will have a hard time reading it!

Fast forward two centuries to Shakespeare's time. Shakespeare, on the other hand, is much, much easier to read for even the average John or Jane Doe on the street. All right, maybe s/he can't understand everything, but it's much closer to Modern English, what I'm typing right now, than what Chaucer wrote two hundred years before Shakespeare. Why so?

Dr. Pagel also looks at other languages, further distanced from English, examining the three major branches of the linguistic family tree: African Bantu, Indo-European and Austronesian. Whilst one can clearly understand how the branches connect to each other, pinpointing when the splits actually occurred proved to be difficult, if not impossible. In fact, the impossibility of finding exact moments of language cleavage supports Dr. Pagel's theory, that language evolution goes through jerky jumps that occur when a new language evolves - just like theory on how animal species evolve.

His theory turns out true since languages, based on current evidence, do not slowly, gradually "drift apart" and split, but rather, the splits occur abruptly and violently. These abrupt language splits account for 1/3 of difference in African Bantu languages, 1/5 of differences between Indo-European languages and approximately 1/10 of Austronesian languages. These figures compare with 1/5 of differences resulting from abrupt evolutionary splits for biological species.

Evolution, for languages and species alike, is thusly an active process. Necessity to adapt to new environments and to avoid crossbreeding account for major reasons triggering evolutionary splits. For language, on the other hand, it seems more likely that cultural needs to distinguish a certain group plays a larger role, rather than a biological one. Compiler of the first American dictionary, Noah Webster  stated, "as an independent nation, our honor requires us to have a system of our own, in language as well as government." Basically, groups, tribes, villages, nations, etc., wanted to create a proper identity, so that if you don't speak the way the group does, the group can label you as an outsider.

Today's Random Picture: 
Speaking of evolution, perhaps he's a mutant? The "real life" version of Magneto from the X-Men, perhaps? =P 

Ivan Stoiljkovic poses for pictures with cutlery stuck to his chest in front of his home near Koprivnica, some 100 kilometres (62 miles) north of the capital Zagreb, May 12, 2011. Ivan, 6, has an extraordinary talent: the ability to attract metallic objects -- from spoons to heavy frying pans -- to his body. He is said to be able to carry up to 25 kg of metal stuck to his torso. Ivan's family also claims that his hands can emit heat and his mysterious ability has also given him healing powers. Medical checkups so far have reaped inconclusive results. Picture taken May 12. REUTERS/Nikola Solic (CROATIA - Tags: SOCIETY ODDLY)

May 19, 2011

Replacing Dominique Strauss-Kahn

As all of you may already know, the sexual assault scandal involving the IMF Head, DSK, led to his resignation today, May 19, 2011. There have been many speculations as to who will head the IMF now that the perv DSK now longer runs the show. Traditionally, an American heads the World Bank (kind of a foil or counterpart to the IMF) while a European usually directs the IMF. As of late, there have been complaints about this European monopolization of heading the IMF and now, especially after the DSK sexual assault debacle, it seems more possible than ever for a non-European to claim the seat. 

The British magazine, The Economist, recently had this chart, speculating the odds of certain possible heirs to the throne:


If a non-European does get the seat, that will be a first as would the appointment of Christine Lagarde, who would become the first female IMF director. 

Personally, I am not a fan of the IMF and if I had to choose to support the IMF or the World Bank, I'd choose the World Bank. This is not because I was born and raised in the U.S. and the traditional World Bank head is an American, but rather, I just do not agree with the ways the IMF deals with financial crises and what they require countries to do in exchange for aid. That's another can of worms that I don't want to open today. Let's just say... the IMF claims to offer help to developing nations, yet its leader stays in $3,000-a-night luxury hotel suites. What a waste! That amount could feed entire families in some countries! Has he no shame? I guess not, since not only is he a thriftless sonofabitch, but he's also a perv.

Today's Random Picture: 
 What a creepster!

May 18, 2011

Days Off Around the World

I'm job hunting at the moment since, while working at the coffee shop is all right, I figure it might be better to get some other type of work experience (and something that pays a little more since tuition + living costs for next semester are going to be a slight problem). On the topic of work, I can't complain too much since even at my current job, I have flexible hours and pretty decent vacation days, things I would have a harder time getting in other countries. 

An article I recently read in The Economist outlined the number of holidays (vacation days) or days off given to workers (on average) in numerous countries around the world. Thought it would be of interest to some of you:  

Of the seven countries compared, Japan has the most public holidays with a whopping 16. In the UK, there are normally only 8 public holidays (exactly half of Japan) but, thanks to the Royal Wedding this year, we have 9 public holidays in 2011. 

Public Holidays

Bulgaria (13)
France (10)
China (11)
US (10)
Japan (16)
UK (8 + 1)
Germany (10)

So according to this graph, it looks like the UK is the hardest working while Japan is the laziest. Hahaha, don't jump to conclusions yet.
Annual Leave

China (5 -> 10)
U.S. (15)
Bulgaria (20)
France (30)
Germany (20)
UK (28)
Japan (20)
 
In terms of annual leave, France takes the top spot with an entire month (thirty days) of vacation allowed (on average) for each employee. The average in the U.S. is fifteen, but actually, some people have as little as five days (I had only five days of annual leave when I was working at the law firms). On average, China is the hardest working nation of the seven based on annual leave alone with only ten days.

Public Holidays + Annual Leave

China (21)
U.S. (25)
Bulgaria (33)
France (40)
Germany (30)
UK (36)
Japan (36)

So when you combine public holidays with annual leave, China remains the hardest working country of the seven while France remains the most slothful of the group. 

 
Sick Days



UK (6)
Germany (7)
U.S. (0)
France (8)
Bulgaria (22)
Japan (0)
China (0)

Then come the sick days. China, the U.S., and Japan are not required to give their workers paid sick days. Rather, if they miss work because they are sick, the employers usually deduct pay for that day when giving them their remuneration. Bulgaria takes the whole cake in this category with a whopping twenty-two sick days allowed annually. 

Public Holidays + Annual Leave + Sick Days



Bulgaria (55)
France (48)
China (21)
US (25)
Japan (36)
UK (42)
Germany (37)

When all the days off are combined, China stays the most hard working country and it is Bulgaria that becomes the laziest. Perhaps these are remnants of the old Soviet era? There's the old Soviet joke that goes, "They pretend to pay us, and we pretend to work." Of course, Bulgaria is no longer a communist nation, but still, it's interesting how that aspect of the Soviet era still seems to linger around.

Today's Random Fact:  
During the rule of Emperor Claudius in the Roman Empire, there were 159 public holidays per year! Wow! I wish I had that many paid public holidays! It would give me ample time to travel the world and get paid for it!

May 17, 2011

Sometimes You Just Need to Laugh

I had a long day at work today (12 hours) and really needed a laugh, luckily, a hilarious video link from my sister was waiting for me in my inbox. Just thought I'd share it with you.

Today's Random Video:

May 16, 2011

Robbing the Cradle

Lately I haven't updated this blog with events going on in my life. Quite frankly, my life hasn't been very exciting these past few months. No immediate travel plans, just work and thesis composition consume a majority of my daily life. There is one thing that is somewhat new. I don't know what it is but the past two boys I've been on dates with (note, these are not really "relationships" as we never even progressed to that level) have been younger than me. The first was nineteen going on twenty, but we agreed to stop seeing each other since he had finals to study for and I was quite busy with my work and writing. It was very natural, the way that ended since there was really nothing to end at all.

Then there is Dave... The story of how I ended up on a date with him is a little strange, perhaps. I was invited to a poker night this past Saturday, which I decided to attend despite my absolute incompetence at card games. Not surprisingly, I lost rather quickly and headed off to another group of people playing board games. Board games, especially puzzles, I’m much better at, and this German block game was something I could deal much better with than poker, which is all about lying, reading people, and chance… things with which I lack expertise. In the end, I was able to face off with one other person, the boy named Dave. He then suggested that we play for something, since, after all, this is the “final” game. I personally couldn’t think of anything to play for except perhaps a few pounds, but then he said, “If I win this game, we have to watch a movie together.” I’m pretty dense, but perhaps not that dense since I kind of took understood it as his way of asking me on a date. Rather bold, I thought but I couldn’t think of anything to ask in return should I win. In the end, my conditions were that we don’t watch a movie together should I win since I knew he was the younger brother of a friend.

Whether unfortunately or fortunately, I lost… by one point, which meant I had to watch a movie with him. Turns out, he’s not so incredibly immature for his age and he picked a really interesting documentary series by BBC titled “Planet Earth” and we watched a couple episodes of “Life” together (Hunter and Hunted and Fish). I really enjoyed the movies and surprisingly, his company since he is probably the funniest boy with whom I’ve ever been on a date. Then comes the catch, he’s eighteen and he’s in the American equivalent of high school! I definitely feel a little awkward knowing that and he knows that I’m twenty-three and that I’m a graduate student in hopes of obtaining a PhD. He will turn nineteen this year, but nine days AFTER my little sister… which makes him younger than my little sister! I really don’t know how to feel about this. How would I feel if my sister told me that she is dating someone older than me? I doubt that I would be OK with it. His older brother is OK with this though, which makes the situation even more awkward for me. In any case, we have another date this weekend, so I suppose I’ll figure out where this is going after date two. Honest opinions, am I robbing the cradle? 

Today's Random Picture: 

May 15, 2011

Suomi Takes the Gold

The Sweden vs. Finland game was painful to watch... it was all bearable until the 3rd period. 

1st: Sweden 0 : 0 Finland
2nd: Sweden 1 : 1 Finland
3rd: Sweden 1 : 6 Finland

Finland scored 5 goals in the third period!!! How did this even happen??? I'm actually still in shock....

In any case, my congrats to the Finns, no hard feelings... I guess. (IKEA is still more awesome than Nokia!) 

Today's Random Quote: 
"Man only learns in two ways, one by reading, and the other by association with smarter people." - Will Rogers

May 14, 2011

How Speech Patterns Sway Opinions

The best way to persuade someone to do as you wish is to speak moderately quickly, pause frequently and not be too animated, US researchers suggest.

The study analysed just under 1,400 calls trying to persuade people to take part in phone surveys.

Those who spoke very fast, did not pause or were too animated were least successful.

A UK language expert said it showed "it's not about what you say, but how you say it".

The University of Michigan Institute of Social Research study used recordings of introductory calls made by 100 male and female telephone interviewers at the institute.

They looked at the interviewers' speech rates, fluency, and pitch, and then at how successful they were in convincing people to participate in the survey.

Those who spoke at a rate of around 3.5 words per second (moderately fast) were much more successful at convincing people to take part than those who spoke very fast or very slowly.

'Too scripted'The researchers, led by Jose Benki, an expert in the psychology of language, said people who speak too quickly are often seen as "out to pull the wool over our eyes", while those who talk very slow are seen as "not too bright or overly pedantic".

The study, funded by the US National Science Foundation and presented to the American Association for Public Opinion Research, also found people thought too much variation in pitch "sounds artificial" and "like people are trying too hard".

Finally, the team found interviewers who paused frequently - around four or five times a minute - were more successful than those who were fluent.

The team suggest they sounded "too scripted".

Dr Rachael-Anne Knight, senior lecturer in phonetics at London's City University, said prosody - the rhythm, stress, and intonation of speech - was key to how what people say is received.

"These features can give us a great deal of information, including how the speaker is feeling at the time and how they feel towards us, the listener.

"For example, we have all experienced situations where someone's words could have been taken a number of different ways, but their tone has offended us, hence when people remark 'it's not what he said, it's the way that he said it'.

"Speakers aren't always aware of the different ways in which their prosody can affect their message, so this research is useful in that it identifies some practical ways in which people trying to get others to participate in telephone surveys might improve their success rates.

"It might also have applications to the service industries, and potentially to all kinds of real-life situations".

Today's Random Picture:

May 13, 2011

Tre Kronor Going to the Finals

For those of you interested in hockey (having playing hockey for about five years, I have some interest in the sport), the International Ice Hockey Federation has an annual World Championship event, as you may already know. Of course, the young U.S. team failed to advance to the semis, but Sweden's Tre Kronor has managed to pull it off and is heading to the finals after defeating the Czech Republic! Just had to put that out there... not many people in England have any interest in ice hockey at all, so I feel a little as though I might as well talk to the wall. Oh well, I will definitely have to watch the Tre Kronor vs. Suomi game on the 15th! Hopefully, this game will not be a repeat of 1995... 

Today's Random Picture:
A more efficient traffic light? 


May 12, 2011

Distorted Thinking

Sometimes, when you've been thinking too much, your brain just refuses to think properly... which reminds me of something my sister sent me recently (she is really interested in psychology): 

15 Styles of Distorted Thinking

1. Filtering: You take the negative details and magnify them, while filtering out all positive aspects of a situation. A single detail may be picked out, and the whole event becomes colored by this detail. When you pull negative things out of context, isolated from all the good experiences around you, you make them larger and more awful than they really are.
2. Polarized Thinking: The hallmark of this distortion is an insistence on dichotomous choices. Things are black or white, good or bad. You tend to perceive everything at the extremes, with very little room for a middle ground. The greatest danger in polarized thinking is its impact on how you judge yourself. For example-You have to be perfect or you're a failure.
3. Overgeneralization: You come to a general conclusion based on a single incident or piece of evidence. If something bad happens once, you expect it to happen over and over again. 'Always' and 'never' are cues that this style of thinking is being utilized. This distortion can lead to a restricted life, as you avoid future failures based on the single incident or event.
4. Mind Reading: Without their saying so, you know what people are feeling and why they act the way they do. In particular, you are able to divine how people are feeling toward you. Mind reading depends on a process called projection. You imagine that people feel the same way you do and react to things the same way you do. Therefore, you don't watch or listen carefully enough to notice that they are actually different. Mind readers jump to conclusions that are true for them, without checking whether they are true for the other person.
5. Catastrophizing: You expect disaster. You notice or hear about a problem and start "what if's." What if that happens to me? What if tragedy strikes? There are no limits to a really fertile catastrophic imagination. An underlying catalyst for this style of thinking is that you do not trust in yourself and your capacity to adapt to change.
6. Personalization: This is the tendency to relate everything around you to yourself. For example, thinking that everything people do or say is some kind of reaction to you. You also compare yourself to others, trying to determine who's smarter, better looking, etc. The underlying assumption is that your worth is in question. You are therefore continually forced to test your value as a person by measuring yourself against others. If you come out better, you get a moment's relief. If you come up short, you feel diminished. The basic thinking error is that you interpret each experience, each conversation, each look as a clue to your worth and value.
7. Control Fallacies: There are two ways you can distort your sense of power and control. If you feel externally controlled, you see yourself as helpless, a victim of fate. The fallacy of internal control has you responsible for the pain and happiness of everyone around you. Feeling externally controlled keeps you stuck. You don't believe you can really affect the basic shape of your life, let alone make any difference in the world. The truth of the matter is that we are constantly making decisions, and that every decision affects our lives. On the other hand, the fallacy of internal control leaves you exhausted as you attempt to fill the needs of everyone around you, and feel responsible in doing so (and guilty when you cannot).
8. Fallacy of Fairness: You feel resentful because you think you know what's fair, but other people won't agree with you. Fairness is so conveniently defined, so temptingly self-serving, that each person gets locked into his or her own point of view. It is tempting to make assumptions about how things would change if people were only fair or really valued you. But the other person hardly ever sees it that way, and you end up causing yourself a lot of pain and an ever-growing resentment.
9. Blaming: You hold other people responsible for your pain, or take the other tack and blame yourself for every problem. Blaming often involves making someone else responsible for choices and decisions that are actually our own responsibility. In blame systems, you deny your right (and responsibility) to assert your needs, say no, or go elsewhere for what you want.
10. Shoulds: You have a list of ironclad rules about how you and other people should act. People who break the rules anger you, and you feel guilty if you violate the rules. The rules are right and indisputable and, as a result, you are often in the position of judging and finding fault (in yourself and in others). Cue words indicating the presence of this distortion are should, ought, and must.
11. Emotional Reasoning: You believe that what you feel must be true-automatically. If you feel stupid or boring, then you must be stupid and boring. If you feel guilty, then you must have done something wrong. The problem with emotional reasoning is that our emotions interact and correlate with our thinking process. Therefore, if you have distorted thoughts and beliefs, your emotions will reflect these distortions.
12. Fallacy of Change: You expect that other people will change to suit you if you just pressure or cajole them enough. You need to change people because your hopes for happiness seem to depend entirely on them. The truth is the only person you can really control or have much hope of changing is yourself. The underlying assumption of this thinking style is that your happiness depends on the actions of others. Your happiness actually depends on the thousands of large and small choices you make in your life.
13. Global Labeling: You generalize one or two qualities (in yourself or others) into a negative global judgment. Global labeling ignores all contrary evidence, creating a view of the world that can be stereotyped and one-dimensional. Labeling yourself can have a negative and insidious impact upon your self-esteem; while labeling others can lead to snap-judgments, relationship problems, and prejudice.
14. Being Right: You feel continually on trial to prove that your opinions and actions are correct. Being wrong is unthinkable and you will go to any length to demonstrate your rightness. Having to be 'right' often makes you hard of hearing. You aren't interested in the possible veracity of a differing opinion, only in defending your own. Being right becomes more important than an honest and caring relationship.
15. Heaven's Reward Fallacy: You expect all your sacrifice and self-denial to pay off, as if there were someone keeping score. You fell bitter when the reward doesn't come as expected. The problem is that while you are always doing the 'right thing,' if your heart really isn't in it, you are physically and emotionally depleting yourself. 



*FromThoughts & Feelingsby McKay, Davis, & Fanning. New Harbinger, 1981. These styles of thinking (or cognitive distortions) were gleaned from the work of several authors, including Albert Ellis, Aaron Beck, and David Burns, among others.


Today's Random Picture: 
A lock that will prevent you from leaving your place while drunk!

May 11, 2011

Pleasures of Insomnia

Okay, I do not masochistically torture myself by deliberately limiting my sleeping hours, which must be clear to everyone. Despite what you may think, I actually enjoy sleeping and dreaming, especially dreaming since I can dream lucidly (in other words, I can control my dreams while I am dreaming and can thus, dream about anything I want). Still, perhaps the fact that our lives last such a short time and perhaps my association of death with eternal sleep make me feel guilty if I do sleep for what normal people would consider ‘enough sleep.” Normally, I sleep for a mere four hours per night, which is half the recommended sleep hours... I am secretly hoping that all my other healthy activities will balance out my incredibly unhealthy, sleep-depriving lifestyle.

Today's Random "Picture":

16 Things You Didn't Know About Sleep

May 10, 2011

Meaning of Life?

A lot of people profoundly ruminate over what the meaning of life is. I personally think that people just tend to overthink things when in actuality, things are quite simple. Make the best with what you have since, after all, in this universe of many galaxies, we are all pretty insignificant "intelligent" beings trying to make a small difference. Sorry if this seems overly philosophical, but I tend to get eerily philosophical around this time of day...

Today's Random "Picture':


May 09, 2011

Das Leben ist zu kurz für den falschen Job

Awesome German ad campaign that translates roughly as "Life is too short for the wrong job"... I couldn't agree more!









Today's Random Quote: 
"The difference between a successful person and others is not a lack of strength, not a lack of knowledge, but rather a lack in will." - Vince Lombardi 

May 08, 2011

Mother's Day

Another Mother's Day, another day I spend away from home... I called my mother today to wish her a "Happy Mother's Day" and I'd mailed her a card, which, she said she received, though her tone was less than enthused. I guess this is the second year in a row that I’ve missed major holidays. Thanksgiving, Christmas, New Year, Mother’s Day… and depending on what the situation is in July, the 4th of July. Callous as I am, I can’t say that I get particularly homesick because I miss my mother. Unfortunately, she just doesn’t show her love the way I’d prefer her to, in a supportive way. Rather, her great expectations of me, what she wants me to do with my life, are in such a stark contrast to my personal goals and expectations that combined, it just doesn’t create a harmonious picture.

It is one of the things that people just don’t understand about me, about my family. The dysfunctional familial situation I grew up in has affected me in small doses rather than larger ones, or thus I like to think. One thing I secretly wish for is a better relationship with my mother, despite our differences, but it seems to me that this is just not going to happen in this dimension. Actually, as I mature, I realize more and more than this inability to completely reconcile the differences between mother and daughter is something that I should just come to accept. You really can’t have everything and I suppose I shouldn’t be so greedy as to want such a perfect little world.

Perhaps my mother does feel a little proud of me, now that I attend a “brand name” university that people acknowledge, though, when speaking with me, she doesn’t show it in the slightest. Well, I apologize that this has turned into a bit of a contemplative reflection on my teeter-tottering relationship with my mother dearest. To all mothers out there, I would like to wish everyone a lovely Mother’s Day, and please, worry a little less about your children. They know more and can take care of themselves better than you think!

Today’s Random Picture:

May 07, 2011

Starving Scholar

As a poor graduate student, I do find it difficult at times to be working full time and attempting to finish my thesis on time. Which reminds me of a hilarious "Dear Dad" letter I stumbled on that I'd like to share with all of you:

Dear Dad,

$chool i$ really great. I am making lot$ of friend$ and $tudying very hard. With all my $tuff, I $imply can't think of anything I need, $o if you would like, you can ju$t $end me a card, a$ I would love to hear from you.

Love,
Your $on.


A week later..... a letter from "home"

Dear Son,

I kNOw that astroNOmy, ecoNOmics, and oceaNOgraphy are eNOugh to keep even an hoNOr student busy. Do NOt forget that the pursuit of kNOwledge is a NOble task, and you can never study eNOugh.

Love,
Dad


Today's Random Cartoon: 
They say that the grass is always greener on the other side...

May 06, 2011

Obesity Among Children in America

This is an increasingly big (pun intended) problem, it seems:

Today's Random Quote: 
"Genius begins great works, labor alone finishes them." 
-Joseph Joubert

May 05, 2011

The Top 10 Psychology Studies of 2010

Ten great studies from 2010 that can improve your life.
Published on December 20, 2010 by Heidi Grant Halvorson, Ph.D. in The Science of Success


1) How to Break Bad Habits

If you are trying to stop smoking, swearing, or chewing your nails, you have probably tried the strategy of distracting yourself - taking your mind off whatever it is you are trying not to do - to break the habit. You may also have realized by now that it doesn't work. Distraction is a great way to resist a passing temptation, but it turns out to be a terrible way to break a habit that has really taken hold.

That's because habit-behaviors happen automatically - often, without our awareness. So thinking about George Clooney isn't going to stop me from biting my nails if I don't realize I'm doing it in the first place.

What you need to do instead is focus on stopping the behavior before it starts (or, as psychologists tend to put it, you need to "inhibit" your bad behavior). According to research by Jeffrey Quinn and his colleagues, the most effective strategy for breaking a bad habit is vigilant monitoring - focusing your attention on the unwanted behavior to make sure you don't engage in it. In other words, thinking to yourself "Don't do it!" and watching out for slipups - the very opposite of distraction. If you stick with it, the use of this strategy can inhibit the behavior completely over time, and you can be free of your bad habit for good.

J. Quinn, A. Pascoe, W. Wood, & D. Neal (2010) Can't control yourself? Monitor those bad habits. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 499-511.


2) How to Make Everything Seem Easier
Most of us have grown accustomed to the idea that our moods, and even our judgments, can be influenced by unrelated experiences of sight and sound - we feel happier on sunny days, more relaxed when listening to certain kinds of music, and more likely to lose our tempers when it's hot and humid. But very few of us have even considered the possibility that our tactile experience - the sensations associated with the things we touch, might have this same power.

New research by Joshua Ackerman, Christopher Nocera, and John Bargh shows that the weight, texture, and hardness of the things we touch are, in fact, unconsciously factored into our decisions about things that have nothing to do with what we are touching.

For instance, we associate smoothness and roughness with ease and difficulty, respectively, as in expressions like "smooth sailing," and "rough road ahead." In one study, people who completed a puzzle with pieces that had been covered in sandpaper later described an interaction between two other individuals as more difficult and awkward than those whose puzzles had been smooth. (Tip: Never try to buy a car or negotiate a raise while wearing a wool sweater. Consider satin underpants instead. Everything seems easy in satin underpants.)

J. Ackerman, C. Nocera, and J. Bargh (2010) Incidental haptic sensations influence social judgments and decisions. Science, 328, 1712- 1715.


3) How To Manage Your Time Better
Good time management starts with figuring out what tasks you need to accomplish, and how long each will take. The problem is, human beings are generally pretty lousy when it comes to estimating the time they will need to complete any task. Psychologists refer to this as the planning fallacy, and it has the very real potential to screw up our plans and keep us from reaching our goals.

New research by Mario Weick and Ana Guinote shows that, somewhat ironically, people in positions of power are particularly poor planners. That's because feeling powerful tends to focus us on getting what we want, ignoring the potential obstacles that stand in our way. The future plans of powerful people often involve "best-case scenarios," which lead to far shorter time estimates than more realistic plans that take into account what might go wrong.

The good news is, you can learn to more accurately predict how long something will take and become a better planner, if you stop and consider potential obstacles, along with two other factors: your own past experiences (i.e., how long did it take last time?), and all the steps or subcomponents that make up the task (i.e., factoring in the time you'll need for each part.)

M. Weick & A. Guinote (2010) How long will it take? Power biases time predictions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.


4) How to Be Happier
Most of us tend to think that if we just had a bit more money we'd get more satisfaction out of life, but on the whole, this turns out not to be true. So why doesn't money make us happier? New research by Jordi Quoidbach and colleagues suggests that the answer lies, at least in part, in how wealthier people lose touch with their ability to savor life's pleasures.

Savoring is a way of increasing and prolonging our positive experiences. Taking time to experience the subtle flavors in a piece of dark chocolate, imaging the fun you'll have on an upcoming vacation (and leafing through your trip photos afterward), telling all your friends on Facebook about the hilarious movie you saw over the weekend - these are all acts of savoring, and they help us to squeeze every bit of joy out of the good things that happen to us.

Why, then, don't wealthier people savor, if it feels so good? It's obviously not for a lack of things to savor. The basic idea is that when you have the money to eat at fancy restaurants every night and buy designer clothes from chic boutiques, those experiences diminish the enjoyment you get out of the simpler, more everyday pleasures, like the smell of a steak sizzling on your backyard grill, or the bargain you got on the sweet little sundress from Target.

Create plans for how to inject more savoring into each day, and you will increase your happiness and well-being much more than (or even despite) your growing riches. And if you're riches aren't actually growing, then savoring is still a great way to truly appreciate what you do have.

J. Quoidbach, E. Dunn, K. Petrides, & M. Mikolajczak (2010) Money giveth, money taketh away: The dual effect of wealth on happiness. Psychological Science, 21, 759-763.

5) How to Have More Willpower
Do you have the willpower to get the job done, or have you found yourself giving in to temptations, distractions, and inaction when trying to reach your own goals? If it's the latter, you're not alone. But more importantly, you can do something about it. New research by Mark Muraven shows that our capacity for self-control is surprisingly like a muscle that can be strengthened by regular exercise.

Do you have a sweet tooth? Try giving up candy, even if weight-loss and cavity-prevention are not your goals. Hate exerting yourself physically? Go out and buy one of those handgrips you see the muscle men with at the gym - even if your goal is to pay your bills on time. In one study, after two weeks of sweets-abstinence and handgripping, Muraven found that participants had significantly improved on a difficult concentration task that required lots of self-control.

Just by working your willpower muscle regularly, engaging in simple actions that require small amounts of self-control - like sitting up straight or making your bed each day - you can develop the self-control strength you'll need to tackle all of your goals.

M. Muraven (2010) Building self-control strength: Practicing self-control leads to improved self-control performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 465-468.


6) How to Choose a Mate
What role does personality play in creating marital bliss? More specifically, is it your personality, your partner's personality, or the similarity between the two that really matters when it comes to being happy in your marriage? A study of over 10,000 couples from three countries provides us with some answers.

Your own personality is in fact a powerful predictor of your marital satisfaction. People who were more agreeable, conscientious, and emotionally stable reported being significantly happier with their spouse. That spouse's personality was also a reliable, though slightly less powerful, predictor of relationship satisfaction. Keep these same traits - the "Big 3" for happiness in a marriage - in mind when you are seeking Mr. or Ms. Right.

Finally, there's personality similarly - which, as it happens, doesn't seem to matter at all. The extent to which married couples matched one another on the Big Five traits had no predictive power when it came to understanding why some couples are happy together and others not. This is not to say that having similar goals or values isn't important - just that having similar personalities doesn't seem to be.

So if you are outgoing and your partner is shy, or if you are adventurous and your partner doesn't really like to try new things, it doesn't mean you can't have a satisfying marriage. Whether you are birds of a feather, or opposites that attracted, you are equally likely to live a long and happy life together.

Just try to be generally pleasant, responsible, and even-tempered, and find someone willing to do the same.

P. Dyrenforth, D. Kashy, M.B. Donnellan, & R. Lucas (2010) Predicting relationships and life satisfaction from personality in nationally representative samples from three countries: The relative importance of actor, partner, and similarity effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 690-702.


7) How to Feel More Powerful
In the animal kingdom, alphas signal their dominance through body movement and posture. Human beings are no different. The most powerful guy in the room is usually the one whose physical movements are most expansive - legs apart, leaning forward, arms spread wide while he gestures. He's the CEO who isn't afraid to swing his feet up onto the conference room table, hands behind his head and elbows jutting outward, confident in his power to spread himself out however he damn well pleases.

The nervous, powerless person holds himself very differently - he makes himself physically as small as possible: shoulders hunched, feet together, hands in his lap or arms wrapped protectively across his chest. He's the guy in the corner who is hoping he won't be called on, and often is barely noticed.

We adopt these poses unconsciously, and they are perceived (also unconsciously) by others as indictors of our status. But a new set of studies by Dana Carney, Amy Cuddy, and Andy Yap reveals that the relationship between power and posing works in both directions. In other words, holding powerful poses can actually make you more powerful.

In their studies, posing in "high power" positions not only created psychological and behavioral changes typically associated with powerful people, it created physiological changes characteristic of the powerful as well. High power posers felt more powerful, were more willing to take risks, and experienced significant increases in testosterone along with decreases in cortisol (the body's chemical response to stress.)

If you want more power - not just the appearance of power, but the genuine feeling of power - then spread your limbs wide, stand up straight, and lean into the conversation. Carry yourself like the guy in charge, and in a matter of minutes your body will start to feel it, and you will start to believe it.

D. Carney, A. Cuddy, and A. Yap (2010) Power posing: Brief nonverbal displays affect neuroendocrine levels and risk tolerance. Psychological Science, 21, 1363-1368.



8) How To Tell If He Loves You
"If he really loved me, then he would..."

Everyone who's ever been in a relationship has had thoughts like this one. If he loved me he would bring me flowers, or compliment me more often, or remember my birthday, or remember to take out the damn garbage. We expect feelings of love to translate directly into loving behaviors, and often judge the quality and intensity of our partner's feelings through their more tangible expressions. When it comes to love, actions speak louder than words, right?

Well, not necessarily. According to new research by psychologists Lara Kammrath and Johanna Peetz, romantic feelings like love, intimacy, and commitment reliably lead to some loving behaviors, but not others. In their studies, love predicted spontaneous, in-the-moment acts of kindness and generosity, like saying "I love you," offering a back rub, or surprising your partner with a gourmet dinner - the kinds of loving actions that don't require much in the way of forethought, planning, or memory.

On the other hand, love does a lousy job of predicting the kinds of "loving" behaviors that are harder to perform, often because they have to be maintained over longer periods of time (e.g., remembering to do household chores without being asked, being nice to one's in-laws) or because there is a delay between the thought and the action (remembering to buy your wife a gift for her birthday next week, keeping a promise call home during your conference in Las Vegas.). When it comes to the harder stuff, it's how conscientious you are, rather than how much in love you are, that really matters.

So if you're trying to get a sense of how your partner really feels about you, the smaller, spontaneous acts of love that occur without much forethought are a much better indicator of the depth of his love than whether or not he remembers your birthday or to take out the trash.

L. Kammrath & J. Peetz (2010) The limits of love: Predicting immediate vs. sustained caring behaviors in close relationships. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.


9) How to Make It Easier to Cut Your Losses

Sometimes, we don't know when to throw in the towel. As a project unfolds, it becomes clear that things aren't working out as planned, that it will cost too much or take too long, or that someone else will beat you to the punch. But instead of moving on to new opportunities, we continue to devote our time, energy, and money to doomed projects (or even doomed relationships), digging a deeper hole rather than trying to climb our way out of it.

Why? The most likely culprit is our overwhelming aversion to sunk costs - the resources that we've put into an endeavor that we can't get back out. We worry far too much about what we'll lose if we just move on, and not nearly enough about the costs of not moving on - more wasted time and effort, and more missed opportunities.

But thanks to recent research by Daniel Molden and Chin Ming Hui, there is a simple way to be sure you are making the best decisions when your endeavor goes awry: focus on what you have to gain, rather than what you have to lose.
Psychologists call this adopting a promotion focus. When Molden and Hui had participants think about their goals in terms of potential gains, they became more comfortable with accepting the losses they had to incur along the way. When they adopted a prevention focus, on the other hand, and thought about their goals in terms of what they could lose if they didn't succeed, they were much more sensitive to sunk costs.

If you make a deliberate effort to refocus yourself prior to making your decision, reflecting on what you have to gain by cutting your losses now, you'll find it much easier to make the right choice.

D. Molden & C. Hui (2010) Promoting de-escalation of commitment: A regulatory focus perspective on sunk costs. Psychological Science.


10) How to Fight With Your Spouse
Having a satisfying, healthy relationship with your partner doesn't mean never fighting - it means learning to fight well. But what is the best way for two people to cope with their anger, frustration, and hurt, without undermining their mutual happiness?

Thankfully, recent research by James McNulty and Michelle Russell provides the answer. The best way to deal with conflict in a marriage, it turns out, depends on how serious or severe the problem is. Did your spouse drink too much at the party last night, or is he drinking too much every night? Did she splurge a little too much on clothes last month, or are her spending habits edging you closer and closer to bankruptcy? Did he invite his mother to dinner without discussing it with you first, or did he invite his mother to live with you without discussing it first? Little problems and big problems require very different approaches if you want to have a lasting, happy marriage.

When it comes to minor problems, direct fighting strategies - like placing blame on your spouse for their actions or expressing your anger - results in a loss of marital satisfaction over time. Flying off the handle when he forgets to pick up the dry cleaning yet again, or when she spends a little too much money on a pricey pair of shoes, is going to take its toll on your happiness in the long run. You really are better off letting the small stuff go.

In response to major problems, however, these same direct fighting strategies predict increased marital satisfaction! Expressing your feelings, blaming your partner and demanding that they change their ways will lead to greater happiness when the conflict in question is something significant - something that if left unresolved could ultimately tear your relationship apart.

Issues involving addiction, financial stability, infidelity, child-rearing, and whether or not you live with your mother-in-law need to be addressed, even if it gets a little ugly. Couples who battle it out over serious issues do a better job of tackling, and eventually resolving those issues, than those who swept big problems under the carpet.

J. McNulty & V.M. Russell (2010) When "negative" behaviors are positive: A contextual analysis of the long-term effects of problem-solving behaviors on changes in relationship satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 587-604.


Today's Random Picture: 
Disney's "Cinderella" juxtaposed to the "Royal Wedding"... some hilarious coincidences or strategic planning? (And I thought Disney's Cinderella was a blond, not a brunette)