Showing posts with label News. Show all posts
Showing posts with label News. Show all posts

May 19, 2011

Replacing Dominique Strauss-Kahn

As all of you may already know, the sexual assault scandal involving the IMF Head, DSK, led to his resignation today, May 19, 2011. There have been many speculations as to who will head the IMF now that the perv DSK now longer runs the show. Traditionally, an American heads the World Bank (kind of a foil or counterpart to the IMF) while a European usually directs the IMF. As of late, there have been complaints about this European monopolization of heading the IMF and now, especially after the DSK sexual assault debacle, it seems more possible than ever for a non-European to claim the seat. 

The British magazine, The Economist, recently had this chart, speculating the odds of certain possible heirs to the throne:


If a non-European does get the seat, that will be a first as would the appointment of Christine Lagarde, who would become the first female IMF director. 

Personally, I am not a fan of the IMF and if I had to choose to support the IMF or the World Bank, I'd choose the World Bank. This is not because I was born and raised in the U.S. and the traditional World Bank head is an American, but rather, I just do not agree with the ways the IMF deals with financial crises and what they require countries to do in exchange for aid. That's another can of worms that I don't want to open today. Let's just say... the IMF claims to offer help to developing nations, yet its leader stays in $3,000-a-night luxury hotel suites. What a waste! That amount could feed entire families in some countries! Has he no shame? I guess not, since not only is he a thriftless sonofabitch, but he's also a perv.

Today's Random Picture: 
 What a creepster!

May 02, 2011

Osama bin Laden Killed - Problems Still Lurking

It's been almost ten years since the September 11, 2001 attacks and finally, it seems the person who plotted this attack has finally been caught. What does this mean? Well, for one, people are celebrating back home in the States, but there may or may not be more significant implications of this event. While getting rid of Osama bin Laden doesn't in the slightest mean the end of terrorism, since, terrorism is a movement without a definite head or solidified/definite country, it does hold some meaning. These past ten-odd years, Osama bin Laden has been a symbol of terrorism for most Americans, and a symbol of the 9/11 attacks and America's failure to capture or kill him was, in a way, a symbol of America's shortcomings or weaknesses. Now, finally, the symbol that had been lingering in the back burners of many Americans has been destroyed. Hooray!

This doesn't necessarily mean that everything is just hunky dory and it's all rainbows and unicorns from now on, either. There are still some major issues at hand, as President Obama mentioned during his May 1st speech announcing the death of bin Laden. It's wonderful that a symbol of "evil" has been dealt with, but now the question is, will America (particularly its politicians) be able to ride the ephemeral wave of public contentment and actually manage to address real issues instead of circumventing major problems?

Undoubtedly, this will be a moment of short-lived public approval. Prior to this event, only 30% of Americans approved of President Obama's performance and 25% were satisfied with Congress. Predictably, these figures will receive a slight bump due to last night's events, but it will inevitably go back down at the present rate of things. Currently, the United States is experiencing what some people are dubbing as the "Great Recession". As the theory of the "stupidity of the masses" states, it seems most Americans have a very short-term memory.

America's current economic slump should not be considered as something foreign and new. In fact, one of the inevitable flaws of capitalism is fluctuation: capitalism, while it comes with perks and benefits, also comes packaged with economic slumps, recessions, and in certain cases of really poor policies/turn of events, depressions. Unless some madly genius economic prodigy can decipher the economic mysteries and create an explanation of how to avoid them completely, fluctuations, these ups and downs, mini-crashes and rises, are a normal part of a capitalistic economy since it is a market-based economy. The United States has faced financial downturns in the past. About a decade before I was born, America was in a lackluster economic situation during former President Jimmy Carter's 1970s debacle, which resulted in his extreme unpopularity as president. Was it hopeless? No! In fact, by the early 1980s, the U.S. was already back on track to recovery... then came the failed "Reagonomics" policies resulting in the eventually recession during the late 1980s, around the time of my birth. Even more recently, in the 1990s, there was another stagnant period with fears of Japan surpassing the United States' economic clout and prowess. Did Japan surpass the U.S. and did the U.S. get “stuck in a rut”, so to speak? Not at all; the United States was able to recover by the mid- and late-1990s and enjoyed high growth while Japan fell into a slump.

All of this is really quite normal in capitalistic societies. So, a decade after the 1990s, we were in the 2000s and it should be no surprise that we’re having, yet again, another downturn of economic events. Perhaps people are starting to feel pessimistic because this recession is lasting a little longer than the past few, but this might in fact, be further prolonged by the American politicians incredible failure to treat several major maladies. 

It's not to say the recovery process hasn't even started yet... it's to say that the recovery to be expedited if only the politicians, instead of looking to get reelected and caring so much about their own egos, would look at the bigger picture and work to help the general populace. Recovery has started, but it has been painfully slow. Unemployment, which normally in the U.S. hovers around 4% or 5% during non-recession periods is still at an abnormally high 9%. While stocks have been pretty consistent, housing prices are still at their lows, purchases are at a minimum, and gas prices are soaring. I think the major sentiment in America right now is that recovery is NOT being felt by the general public. It still feels very much like a recession, which is understandable. 

One of the major problems now is actually President Obama's policy of trying to "one up" China, which should not be a goal of the U.S. or of any other nation. A country shouldn't necessarily to to out-do another country in order to experience growth. Each country is different and unique with its own problems and quirks so there is no "cure-all" for a financial disease. If there were, then no country in the world would have to experience poverty. Since there is a unique formula that works for each country, it should use a customized treament plan rather than try to simply beat out another player. Globalization is about cooperation. Innovation and development of China spells good news for the U.S. and the rest of the world as well, not gloom and doom about a dark future. People really need to understand that. The U.S. has a lot of advantages already, no need to count them and juxtapose them to those of other countries. There is a vast domestic market, excellent higher educational institutions, lots of resources, Silicon Valley, innovative ideas, among others. Count your blessing first before envying or trying to compare.

I won't go on any further... don't want to lecture you. 

A final comment on bin Laden's death: ten years, two wars, 919,967 deaths, and $1,188,263,000,000 later, we managed to kill one person. Was it worth it? It's definitely a pyrrhic "victory".

Today's Random Picture: 
This undated aerial handout image provided by the CIA shows the Abbottabad compound in Pakistan where American forces in Pakistan killed Osama bin Laden. (AP Photo/CIA)

January 03, 2009

Person of the Year

Not surprisingly, Barack Obama is Time magazine's "Person of the Year." I remember following the election into the wee hours of the early morning back in Bamako, listening to his victory speech, and feeling like I was included in the celebrations. Obama's rise to politics is probably one of the most unprecendented and fastest rises to power in American history. He didn't take small steps to become president... he took leaps and bounds. It's pretty amazing, actually. I like Obama more than Bush, by far and he's lightyears better than McCain or Palin... but I do admit, I'm still rather skeptical about him. I am not exactly a "fan" of any politician - all politicians are corrupt and Barack Obama is no exception. After all, he DID approve the FISA, a piece of legislation that violates everything "America" is allegedly standing for - freedom, privacy, right to counsel... but no, he voted for the FISA and now, the government can arrest anyone without right to trials, invade our privacy freely, just on the premise of "terrorism." I was actually quite disappointed when Obama approved it but still, he was the best candidate in 2008. Hillary Clinton is a power-hungry, opportunistic bitch, McCain is a conservative old fart, John Edwards is a cheating, ex-malpractice lawyer with an annoying southern accent, and the other Republican candidates were all freaks (Huckabee is a religious nut who wants to include "God" in the constitution, Romney is a freaking Mormon who only won votes because the economy was doing poorly and because he's a successful business - just because you're a successful businessman doesn't mean you're going to miraculously improve the economy!). We'll see... he's going to be inaugurated in a little more than a week... he can't do worse than George W. Bush, right? *knock on wood!*

After checking out that article in Der Spiegel, I went to the BBC site to read up some news I missed out on during the past few weeks while I was still in Mali. I actually don't read/listen/watch American news anymore. All my news sources come from Le Monde, France 2, Der Spiegel, The Economist, Telemadrid, Rai, and BBC. Anyway, while reading some articles on BBC, I stumbled upon a particular article that surprised me. No, more than surprised, it appalled and disgusted me. Here's the article, and you can also find it online
here:

Stalin voted third-best Russian

Portrait of Joseph Stalin at Communist Party celebration of his birthday - 21/12/2008
Stalin continues to be popular with many Russians
Former Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin was beaten by medieval prince Alexander Nevsky in a poll held by a TV station to find the greatest Russian.
Stalin came third, despite being responsible for the deaths of millions of Soviets in labour camps and purges.
Alexander Nevsky fought off European invaders in the 13th century to preserve a united Russia.
In second place was reformist Prime Minister Pyotr Stolypin, who was assassinated in 1911.
More than 50 million people voted by phone, the internet or via text messages in the poll held by Rossiya, one of Russia's biggest television stations.
The voting took place over six months as 500 original candidates were whittled down to a final 12.
Rehabilitation campaign
Stalin - born an ethnic Georgian - was riding high for many months and was in the number one slot at one point until the show's producer appealed to viewers to vote for someone else, says the BBC's Richard Galpin in Moscow.
Stalin sent millions of people to their deaths in the work camps of the Gulag. Millions more perished in political purges or during the forced collectivisation of farms during his rule from the 1920s to his death in 1953.
Many in Russia do still revere Stalin for his role during World War II when the Soviet Union defeated the forces of Nazi Germany.
Screenshot of Name of Russia website on 23 December
The poll was conducted online and by phone and text message
But now there is a much broader campaign to rehabilitate Stalin and it seems to be coming from the highest levels of government, says our correspondent.
"We now have to think very seriously, why the nation chooses to put [Joseph] Stalin in third place," said actor and film director Nikita Mikhalkov, one of the contest's judges, after the results were released.
Nevsky fought off Swedish and Germanic invasions to preserve medieval Russia. He also pursued a conciliatory policy with the powerful Mongol rulers to protect Russia's eastern flank.
He was canonised as a saint by the Russian Orthodox Church in the 16th century.
Stolypin is remembered for his attempts to modernise agriculture and stifle leftist revolutionaries as prime minister under Tsar Nicholas II.


How in fucking hell, heaven, and earth did Stalin get voted the "Third Best Russian" by Russians. Are they really that poorly informed? Or is Russia really that lacking in terms of "good" people. I don't understand. Voting Stalin as the 3rd Best Russian is equivalent to voting Hitler as the 3rd Best German (Stalin was actually an ethnic Georgian; Hitler was actually Austrian before he became a German citizen). Stalin was really just as bad, if not worse, than Hitler. He tortured and killed millions and millions of people (probably more than Hitler; historians estimate that Stalin was responsible for the deaths of about 10million people or more). Even during the war, he orchestrated the mass murder of thousands of Polish soldiers... and he's the 3rd Best Russian??? HOW??? It's preposterous! I'd even say that Czar Alexander II was a better Russian than Stalin, at least before he was assassinated he seemed to be the most promising of the czars in the last 300 years or so. Even Peter I or "Peter the Great" is better than Stalin, despite his policies being not-so-popular among many people and even though he tortured and killed his own son, Alexei. What about Sergei Witte? He was among the better "Russians" in History, despite his tariffs being unpopular, he was still the great reformer and the mind behind the Trans-Siberian Railroad, which still exists today! And Peter Chaadaev, Vissarion Belinksy, Alexander Herzen... among a plethora of other Enlightenment/post-Enlightenment Russian liberals? What about Katerina Breshkovskaia who was part of the "Going to the People" movement? Who said the best Russians were politicians anyway? What about Leo Tolstoy, Fyodor Dostoyevsky, and Alexander Pushkin; all famous Russian writers whose literary works had an impact not just on Russian literature, but is read throughout the world? Trotsky and Lenin were better Russians than Stalin!!! How could they have voted Stalin as the 3rd best Russian??? I don't understand. I don't understand at all. Do most Russians really think Stalin was such a great man? Если вы русский, не стесняйтесь сообщить неведении Американка.

Today's Random Quiz:

You Remember 90% of 2008

You were paying attention during 2008.
And you remember what happened really well.

You'll be able to talk about 2008 for years to come...
Even when most people have forgotten what went down.